Going live is no longer a necessity, it's become a genre within itself.
- 'As live' - recorded to appear live, minimal pick-ups etc, post-production is kept to a minimum
- Not as spontaneous as live, more controllable, more polished - opportunity to re-record elements.
- Do not require paraphanelia of live programming, satellite trucks etc - cost reduced
- Immediacy makes it an 'event'
- Risk becoming too manufactured, losing ege.
- Hard to recreate tension of live programming
- Audience can feel cheated
Formats:
- Panel shows
- Quiz shows
- Chat shows
- Music
- Entertainment/comedy
Themes:
- Audience
- usually in studio - full studio floor crew required
- Often involve on screen guests/talent + main presenter/anchor
- Often topical/driven by special events or dates
- Often use VT inserts
Genre impact:
- May dictate content, style and location. (Consider differences between question time and graham norton)
- Recorded on location (Outside broadcast/OB) or in studio
- Expectation of audience
Audience
- Passive - simple quietly viewing
- Participatory/active - actually taking part in some way
- Appreciative - responding through laughter, clapping etc
- Supportive - there to back a contributor
Content
- Almost anything can be presented as-live, but consider:
- Time (This is a huge factor. Must be carefully time so each segment fits prescribed evaluation. Timings should be considered to test viability of idea.)
- Location
- Budget
- Logistics
On location
- Advances in satellite technology has led to advent of OBs such as:
- Sporting events - Olympics
- National/International celebrations - Royal wedding
- Ceremonial events - coronations or other investitures
CASE STUDY: LIVE AID (July 1985)
- event staged simultaneously at Wembley stadium and JFK stadium
- BBC gave the schedules over to the event - unprecedented - 16 hours of rock music
- Event also broadcast live in the UK on television and radio. (Also broadcasts from Australia, Austria
- The Soviet Union also broadcast live - first time anyone in the West had ever seen an uncensored, live broadcast from the USSR
- Plagued by technical problems. (Satellite breakdowns and feedback noise)
- Phil Collins flew on concorde to play both shows.
- ONE OFF SPECIALS e.g. Telethons or concerts
- Reality TV output e.g. Big Brother
- News programmes
- Magazine programmes
- Disasters are often a prompt for ‘round the clock’ live coverage - DISASTERS e.g. 9/11
- The advent of domestic handheld video cameras and phones has increased the amount of on the scene material available.
- During the 9/11 terrorist attacks a stream of on the scene material shot by people on the ground painted an intimate and personal POV of events.
- This material is readily available and often utilised by broadcasters
- Programme makers increasingly appeal and cater for viewer created content.
- Additional source of content has now evolved into a major source of programme content.
- Broadcasters now collaborate with their audience
- Eg Facebook Live – offering new opportunities for live broadcasts online.
Current projections estimate a 50% share of viewing time spent online by 2020 the future of live may lie online
- Whatever the platform, live broadcasts represent a unique opportunity to engage audiences and to promote content.
- Become a 'gimmick' to be exploited
- the added tension of ‘what might go wrong’ can draw audiences in – increasingly being used to market brands.
- Special editions of Eastenders, e.g. 2010 marking its 25th anniversary, gained an audience of 16.6m ¡ Coronation Street’s 50th anniversary live special in 2010 was watched by 14m.
THE SOUND OF MUSIC (LIVE):
- Buttocks clench, adrenaline pumps
- 'Never been done' experience
- Iconic, public appeal
- Orchestrations pre-recorded, helps actors keep timings etc
- 17 cameras
Live experiment
- Formatting tool - 2011 BBC3 produced 'Frankenstein Live' - Attempt to inject new life into classic
- success was questionable, but it is a good example of how a live event can be utilised to re-generate a genre.
- Much of what is perceived as live, is in fact pre-recorded - actually relies heavily on pre-prepared VT inserts.
- E.g. News or magazine programmes using preshot material
- Expands the possibilities of content and allows producers to vary locations
- Live programming is fraught with challenges, not least of all planning and potential technical issues
- Meticulous planning is essential
- OB lives even more so as there is the potential for infamous loss of the satellite link
- Strategies are generally evolved to cope with these potential pitfalls.
- Studio based content - handling back to the studio in times of trouble
- VT - pre-shot material to be moved up and down running order as needed
- Back up material/stand by VT
- However the possibility of mistakes live on air adds vitality and tension to programme
- Studio team are charged by very notion of being live and this translates to audiences at home
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3o9sIZkEego
THE LAW
- Lives are particularly vulnerable to legal problems, be it the use of rude content before watershed
- Sex Pistols swear on live TV 1976
- Even pre-shot VTs can experience live problems
- It is the job of the gallery teams and the producer and PA to work together to ensure they have another story to take over.
- Serious questions posed about the integrity of material presented as live from major broadcasters in 2007/8. Competitons in particular were being 'mocked up' to deal with problems experienced by the production team.
- Blue Peter was fied £50,000 by Ofcom after a visiting child was asked to pose as a phone in competition winner.
- Live TV is typically delayed by a few seconds to catch swearing etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment